Every trial lawyer knows the feeling: a high-value case walks through your door with serious merit and substantial potential recovery, but taking it on means tens of thousands—sometimes hundreds of thousands—of dollars in case costs coming straight out of your firm's pocket. Expert witnesses, medical records, depositions, trial graphics, and all the other expenses that build a winning case add up fast.

For years, you've probably accepted this as just the cost of doing business. You work on contingency, so you cover case expenses, and if you win, you recover those costs along with your fee. It's how plaintiff work has always been done.

But here's the question most trial lawyers never stop to ask: What is this approach actually costing you?

As we enter 2026, it's time to take a hard look at how you fund litigation and whether your current strategy is truly serving your firm's best interests—or quietly limiting your growth, your case selection, and your firm's financial health.

The True Cost of Using Firm Capital for Case Expenses

When you write checks for case costs from your firm's operating account, you're not just spending money—you're making an investment decision with significant hidden costs that most attorneys never fully calculate.

You're Using After-Tax Dollars

This is the cost that catches most lawyers by surprise. Every dollar you spend on case expenses comes from money your firm has already earned and paid taxes on. If your effective tax rate is 35-40% (considering federal, state, and self-employment taxes), you actually need to earn $1.50 to $1.70 to have $1 available to spend on case costs.

Think about that for a moment. A $50,000 case that requires $50,000 in expenses isn't breaking even at settlement—you needed to earn roughly $75,000 to $85,000 in other cases just to have that $50,000 available to invest. That's a massive hidden cost that erodes your returns on every contingency case you handle.

Opportunity Cost Is Real

Every dollar tied up in case costs is a dollar you can't use elsewhere in your firm. Maybe you've been putting off hiring an associate who could handle smaller cases. Perhaps you've delayed marketing efforts that would bring in new clients. Or maybe you're simply keeping less cash in reserve than you'd like for peace of mind.

This opportunity cost compounds over time. If you typically have $200,000 to $500,000 tied up in active case expenses at any given time, that's capital that could be earning returns elsewhere or providing financial flexibility when you need it most.

Cash Flow Strain Limits Your Practice

Perhaps the most insidious cost of funding cases from firm capital is how it constrains your case selection and growth. When your capital is limited, you face difficult choices. Do you take on that promising but expensive case, or do you pass because you're already stretched thin across your current docket?

Many talented trial lawyers turn down excellent cases not because they doubt the merit, but because they can't afford the upfront investment. This creates a competitive disadvantage against larger firms with deeper pockets, and it means you're leaving significant revenue on the table.

The Risk Sits Entirely on Your Balance Sheet

When you fund cases with firm capital, your firm bears 100% of the financial risk. If a case resolves unfavorably or settles for less than expected, those expenses come straight off your bottom line. A few unexpected losses can create serious financial stress, especially for smaller firms or solo practitioners.

When Using Firm Capital Makes Sense (and When It Doesn't)

Let's be clear: there's nothing inherently wrong with using firm capital to fund case expenses. For smaller cases with modest costs and relatively quick resolutions, it often makes perfect sense. Writing a $3,000 check for medical records and a single expert on a straightforward case that will settle in six months is probably fine.

The problems arise when you apply this same approach to every case, regardless of size or complexity. High-value cases that require $50,000, $100,000, or more in expenses, cases that will take 18-36 months to resolve, complex litigation requiring multiple experts and extensive discovery, and cases that push your firm's financial limits are all situations where alternative funding strategies deserve serious consideration.

Think of it this way: you wouldn't use the same trial strategy for every case, regardless of the facts. Why use the same funding strategy for every case, regardless of the financial profile?

The Case for Case-Specific Financing

Sophisticated trial lawyers across the country are increasingly turning to case-specific financing as a strategic tool, not a sign of weakness. This approach allows you to preserve firm capital, take on larger and more complex cases, diversify your case portfolio without overextending, compete with larger firms on equal footing, and protect your downside risk.

The concept is straightforward: instead of using after-tax firm dollars to pay for case expenses, you access dedicated case financing that covers those costs. The financing is tied to the specific case, with repayment coming from the case proceeds if and when the case resolves favorably.

How Modern Case Financing Works

Traditional litigation funding often meant lengthy application processes, restrictive terms, and giving up a significant portion of case proceeds. Modern solutions like Level Case Financing (LCF) have evolved to address these pain points.

At Level Esq, we've built a case-specific credit line designed exclusively for plaintiff firms. Rather than evaluating your entire firm's finances or requiring extensive documentation for every advance, our automated underwriting system delivers decisions in hours rather than months. This means when you need to retain an expert or schedule a critical deposition, you have timely access to the funds without bureaucratic delays.

The financing is structured to match the unique demands of trial practice. Competitive rates and repayment schedules align with your case timeline, not arbitrary monthly payment requirements. Because the financing is case-specific, you maintain clear separation between different matters in your portfolio.

One often-overlooked advantage is case-level interest tracking. Many jurisdictions allow recovery of reasonable financing costs as part of case expenses. With clear, case-specific tracking, you can pursue recovery of these costs where applicable, something that's impossible when costs are comingled with general firm operations.

Calculating What You're Really Spending

Before you can make an informed decision about case financing, you need to understand what your current approach actually costs. Here's a simple framework to calculate the true expense of using firm capital:

Start with your total case costs for a specific matter. Multiply by 1.5 to 1.7 to account for the after-tax dollars needed to generate that capital (adjust based on your actual tax rate). Add any opportunity costs—what could that capital have earned if invested elsewhere or used for firm growth? Factor in the risk cost—if the case doesn't succeed, that's a complete loss coming from firm profits.

Let's look at a real example. Say you have a strong case that requires $80,000 in expenses over 18 months. Using firm capital, you actually need to earn approximately $120,000 to $136,000 in other cases to have that $80,000 available after taxes. If you could earn even a modest 5% return on that capital elsewhere, that's another $6,000 to $7,000 in opportunity cost over 18 months. Your true cost is closer to $126,000 to $143,000.

Now compare that to case-specific financing. Even with interest costs, the total might be $88,000 to $92,000, payable only if the case succeeds. The difference of $34,000 to $51,000 represents real money that stays in your firm—money you can use to hire staff, market your practice, take on additional cases, or simply maintain a healthier cash reserve.

Making the Switch in 2026

If you're realizing that your current case funding approach is costing more than you thought, you're not alone. Many successful trial lawyers have reached the same conclusion and made strategic changes to how they finance litigation.

The key is to think about case financing as a tool in your practice management toolkit, not an all-or-nothing decision. You might continue funding smaller cases from firm capital while using case-specific financing for your larger, more complex matters. This hybrid approach gives you flexibility while maximizing the strategic benefits of both methods.

Start with Your Biggest Cases

A practical way to transition is to begin with your most expensive current cases or the next high-value case you take on. See how case-specific financing changes your cash flow and stress levels. Most attorneys who try this approach find it immediately beneficial and wonder why they didn't make the switch sooner.

Build Relationships Before You Need Them

Just as you advise clients not to wait until they're in crisis to seek legal help, don't wait until you're cash-strapped to explore financing options. Establishing a relationship with a case financing provider when you're in a strong position gives you immediate access to capital when the right case comes along.

Focus on Growth, Not Survival

The most powerful aspect of strategic case financing isn't just protecting your downside—it's enabling growth you couldn't otherwise achieve. When you're not constantly worried about cash flow or turning down cases because of capital constraints, you can focus on what you do best: trying cases and serving clients.

Imagine starting 2026 with the ability to say yes to every strong case that comes your way, regardless of the expected costs. Imagine competing for high-value cases without worrying whether you can afford the investment. Imagine building a more diverse case portfolio because you're not betting the firm on every major matter.

Your Competitive Advantage in 2026

The legal landscape is increasingly competitive, and trial lawyers who adapt their business strategies have a significant advantage. While other attorneys continue draining their capital reserves and turning down cases they can't afford, you can be building a stronger, more diverse practice.

At Level Esq, we've helped plaintiff firms across the country rethink their approach to case financing. Our Level Case Financing solution provides the speed, flexibility, and case-specific structure that modern trial practices need. With automated underwriting that delivers decisions in hours and terms that align with your case timelines, we've removed the traditional barriers that made case financing feel like a last resort instead of a strategic advantage.

Whether you're a solo practitioner looking to take on your first major case or an established firm seeking to expand your capacity without risking firm stability, case-specific financing opens doors that using firm capital simply cannot.

This year, commit to running your practice with the same strategic thinking you bring to case preparation. Calculate what you're really spending, understand your alternatives, and make informed decisions that protect your firm's financial health while positioning you for growth.

Stop using your firm's after-tax money to cover case costs. Start 2026 with a smarter case funding strategy that protects your downside and unlocks your firm's full potential.

‍