The start of a new year brings fresh opportunities—and for trial lawyers, it should also bring a critical evaluation of your case portfolio and funding strategy. Yet most plaintiff firms approach Q1 the same way they approach every other quarter: reactively managing whatever cases land on their desk, scrambling to cover expenses as they arise, and making funding decisions in the moment rather than strategically.

This approach might keep the lights on, but it won't build a sustainable, scalable litigation practice.

The most successful trial lawyers treat their practice like the business it is. They conduct regular portfolio reviews, analyze which cases are generating returns versus which are consuming capital, and make strategic decisions about case intake and funding. They don't wait for cash flow crises to evaluate their financial strategy—they proactively plan for growth.

If you're running a small to medium-sized plaintiff firm, Q1 2026 is the perfect time to implement this strategic approach. Here's how to conduct a comprehensive case portfolio review that sets your firm up for sustainable success throughout the year.

Why Q1 Is the Ideal Time for Portfolio Review

Timing matters in strategic planning. Q1 offers several distinct advantages for evaluating your litigation practice:

Fresh financial data. You have a complete year of financial results to analyze. You know exactly which cases settled, what revenue they generated, how much you spent on case costs, and what your cash flow patterns looked like. This concrete data beats guesswork every time.

Natural planning cycle. Most businesses do annual planning in Q1, and your law firm should be no exception. Your clients are planning their year, your competitors are planning theirs, and you should be thinking strategically about where your practice is headed.

Time to course-correct. If you identify problems in January or February, you have ten months to address them. Waiting until Q3 or Q4 means you're running out of time to implement meaningful changes before the year ends.

Capital deployment decisions. Understanding your case portfolio early in the year helps you make smarter decisions about capital allocation. You can identify which cases need additional investment, which ones are consuming too much capital relative to their likely return, and where strategic case financing might improve your overall position.

Step 1: Audit Your Current Case Costs and Capital Exposure

Start with the numbers. Pull a report showing every active case and the outstanding costs for each one. This should include expert witness fees, medical records, deposition costs, court reporters, filing fees, investigators, and any other expenses you've advanced.

Now look at the total. Many trial lawyers are shocked when they see this number in black and white. You might discover you have $250,000, $400,000, or even more tied up in active case costs. That's capital that's not available for anything else—not payroll, not marketing, not hiring, not growth investments.

But the raw number is only part of the story. What you really need to understand is which cases are consuming disproportionate amounts of capital relative to their likely return.

A case with $150,000 in costs that's likely to generate $1.5 million in fees is a completely different situation than a case with $100,000 in costs that might generate $300,000 in fees—or might not settle at all. The first case has strong economics even with high costs. The second case has concerning risk-return dynamics that deserve scrutiny.

Create a simple spreadsheet with these columns: Case name, date filed, current costs, estimated additional costs, probability of success, estimated settlement value, expected fee, and projected net profit. This exercise forces you to think critically about each matter rather than just keeping cases on autopilot.

You'll likely discover a few things:

Some cases have better economics than you realized and deserve additional investment. Other cases have worse economics than you thought and might warrant serious settlement discussions or even withdrawal if ethically permissible. And almost certainly, you'll find cases where the capital you have tied up could be deployed more profitably elsewhere if you had access to case-specific financing.

Step 2: Identify Cases Where Financing Would Improve ROI

Once you understand your current capital exposure, the next question is strategic: where would case financing improve your overall position?

The obvious candidates are high-cost cases that are consuming too much of your working capital. If you have a product liability case with $200,000 in outstanding costs and another $100,000 in anticipated expenses, that's $300,000 of firm capital that's locked up until the case resolves. Financing those costs frees up capital for other opportunities.

But there's a less obvious category that's often even more valuable: cases where additional investment would significantly improve outcomes, but you can't afford to make that investment from current capital.

Maybe you have a medical malpractice case where hiring a top-tier medical expert would cost $50,000, but that expert's testimony could be the difference between a $2 million settlement and a $4 million one. The ROI on that $50,000 investment is enormous—potentially $800,000 in additional fees. But if you don't have $50,000 available without compromising other cases, you're stuck.

This is where strategic case financing creates real value. It's not just about covering costs you can't afford—it's about enabling investments that generate outsized returns but that you couldn't otherwise make without jeopardizing your firm's financial stability.

Look through your case list specifically for these opportunities. Which cases would benefit from better experts, more comprehensive discovery, or enhanced litigation support? Where are you making compromises due to capital constraints rather than strategic necessity? Those are your highest-value financing opportunities.

Step 3: Balance Your Portfolio Mix

Smart investors don't put all their money in one asset class. They balance high-risk, high-reward investments with steadier, more predictable returns. Trial lawyers should think the same way about their case portfolio.

Your practice should include a mix of different case types with different risk profiles and timelines:

Quick-turn cases that will likely settle within 6-12 months provide steady cash flow and keep your pipeline moving. These might be straightforward personal injury cases with clear liability and adequate insurance coverage. They're not going to transform your practice, but they pay the bills and provide predictable revenue.

Medium-complexity cases that will take 12-24 months to resolve and have moderate upfront costs represent your bread and butter. These cases require real legal skill, generate solid fees, and create the foundation of a sustainable practice. Most of your portfolio should probably sit in this category.

High-value, complex cases that might take 2-3 years and require significant capital investment are your growth engines. These are the cases that generate life-changing fees, build your reputation, and allow you to scale your practice. But you can't have too many of these at once unless you have the capital to fund them properly.

Review your current portfolio mix. Are you too heavily weighted toward one category? Many small plaintiff firms end up with too many quick-turn, lower-value cases because they can't afford the capital requirements of larger matters. This keeps them busy but limits growth.

The ideal mix depends on your firm's size, expertise, and growth goals, but most small to medium-sized plaintiff firms should aim for roughly 60% medium-complexity cases, 25% quick-turn cases, and 15% high-value complex cases. This balance provides cash flow stability while still pursuing transformational opportunities.

If your current mix doesn't match your goals, Q1 is the time to adjust. That might mean being more selective about small cases, actively pursuing larger matters, or using law firm financing to enable a more balanced portfolio.

Step 4: Plan Case Intake Strategy Based on Merit, Not Just Capital

This is where most plaintiff firms make their biggest mistake. They let capital availability drive case selection rather than case quality. A great case walks in the door, but they pass on it because they can't afford the expenses. A mediocre case comes along, but they take it because it won't require much capital investment.

This backwards approach virtually guarantees you'll stay small.

Instead, your Q1 planning should establish clear criteria for case selection based on merit:

Minimum expected value. What's your threshold for taking a case? Some firms won't touch anything with less than $500,000 in expected recovery. Others set their floor at $1 million. Whatever your number, make it explicit.

Liability standards. How strong does liability need to be? Most successful plaintiff lawyers won't take cases where they assess liability at less than 60-70% probability of success.

Defendant creditworthiness. Can the defendant pay? A winning verdict is worthless if you can't collect.

Strategic fit. Does this case align with your firm's expertise and reputation goals, or is it a distraction?

Once you have clear merit-based criteria, the next question is capacity. Based on your current staffing and infrastructure, how many cases can you competently handle? Maybe that's 25 active matters, maybe it's 40, maybe it's 15 if they're all complex commercial litigation. Know your capacity.

Now here's the key insight: if you have capacity available and cases that meet your merit criteria, you should take them—regardless of whether you have the capital to self-fund the expenses. That's where strategic case financing comes in. It allows you to fill your capacity with high-quality cases rather than limiting your practice to whatever you can self-fund.

At Level Esq, we work with trial lawyers to make exactly this transition. Level Case Financing (LCF) provides case-specific credit lines that let you evaluate cases purely on merit. If the case is strong and you have capacity, you take it. The financing ensures you can fund it properly without compromising your firm's financial position.

Our automated underwriting delivers decisions in hours, not months, so you can move quickly when good cases come along. Competitive rates and repayment schedules aligned with case timelines mean financing costs are predictable and manageable. And case-level interest tracking lets you recover costs where permissible, maintaining profitability.

Step 5: Set Quarterly Review Benchmarks

A Q1 portfolio review is valuable, but it's even more powerful when it becomes a regular practice. Establish quarterly review benchmarks that you'll track throughout the year:

Total capital exposure. How much do you have tied up in case costs? Is that number growing or shrinking?

Portfolio mix. Are you maintaining the balance between quick-turn, medium-complexity, and high-value cases?

Case-level profitability. Which cases are performing better than expected? Which are consuming more capital than anticipated?

Cash flow patterns. Are you experiencing cash flow stress? Are you having to pass on good cases due to capital constraints?

Opportunity losses. How many strong cases did you refer out or decline because you couldn't afford the expenses?

These metrics tell you whether your strategy is working or whether you need to adjust. Maybe you discover in Q2 that you're taking on too many small cases and need to be more selective. Maybe Q3 reveals that you're consistently passing on great cases due to capital constraints, signaling it's time to explore litigation financing. Maybe Q4 shows your cash flow is strong and you can take on more aggressive case investments.

The point is to be proactive rather than reactive. You're running a business, and sophisticated business owners monitor key metrics and adjust their strategy based on data, not gut feel.

Building a Sustainable Practice for 2026 and Beyond

The difference between law firms that scale successfully and those that stay small often comes down to strategic thinking about case portfolio management and funding. The firms that grow treat their practice like a business. They know which cases are generating returns, where capital is locked up, and how to balance their portfolio for sustainable growth.

They also understand that capital constraints shouldn't limit their ability to take on great cases. With strategic access to case-specific financing, they can fill their capacity with high-quality matters, invest appropriately in case development, and preserve working capital for business growth.

This Q1, commit to conducting a thorough portfolio review. Audit your current capital exposure, identify financing opportunities, balance your case mix, establish merit-based intake criteria, and set benchmarks for quarterly monitoring.

If you discover that capital constraints are limiting your growth—and most trial lawyers do—it's worth exploring how case financing can change the equation.

At Level Esq, we help plaintiff firms evaluate their current funding approach and calculate what it's really costing them. We can show you what becomes possible when you can make case decisions based on merit rather than available capital. And we provide the financing structure that enables sustainable growth without betting your firm's stability on any individual case.

Your 2026 success starts with the strategic decisions you make in Q1. Make them count.

‍